With a view to disseminate, and possibly replicate the SPEAQ student mentoring project within the Faculty of Letters, we organized a meeting with a group of first year students from other departments of the faculty, on April 11th, 2013. They belonged to specializations with different numbers of students, ranging from a dozen to more than a hundred, which would enable them to test their organization skills and the feasibility of such a project at micro and macro level.
The main topics we tackled were the following:
- an overview of the SPEAQ project, including the SPEAQ blog;
- the presentation of the peer-to-peer mentoring programme within the Applied Modern Languages Department, as piloted during this past academic year;
- a debate concerning their first week at the faculty, as seen in retrospect, focusing on what would have made their life easier if some particular issues had been addressed, in due time, with the help of peer mentors;
- a list of the things they wished they had known before and during the winter exam period, with a view to adapting the information provided by the student mentors to the different stages of the university year.
As the discussion unfolded, they were asked to fill in their requests in an imaginary first-week-timetable. This brainstorming session revealed an ideal “getting acquainted with the faculty” timetable, one of whose versions could look as follows:
|Monday||A crash course in topography, so that the faculty should be less of a “terra incognita”|
|Tuesday||Reading the timetable – why are the weeks called “odd” and “even”?|
|Wednesday||Where do I belong? Are practical course groups formed according to some alphabetical order criterion?|
|Thursday||How do I join and access the faculty libraries?|
|Friday||What are the credits and the contracts? How do I apply for a scholarship?|
The clearest signs that these students found the initiative useful and are eager to put into practice a peer-to-peer mentoring programme in their respective departments were the detailed questions they asked regarding the impediments we had faced and the fact that they shared the idea with their own teachers the very next day. We would be happy to witness an “upgraded” version of our initiative following next autumn.
Assistant Lecturer, Babeş-Bolyai University